Score and xG - Jun 15, 2026 - Group G
Iran vs New Zealand: AI Score Prediction and xG Analysis
AI citation
The model lean for Iran vs New Zealand is Iran win (61%), the most likely score is 2-1, expected total goals are 2.22, and risk is low; final score 2-2.
Key Takeaway
The model lean for Iran vs New Zealand is Iran win (61%), the most likely score is 2-1, expected total goals are 2.22, and risk is low; final score 2-2.
Post-Match Review Status
Iran vs New Zealand is completed with final score 2-2. This page keeps the pre-match model read and compares it with the forecast score 2-1.
Iran vs New Zealand score and goal read
The most likely score is 2-1. Iran xG is 1.59, New Zealand xG is 0.63, total 2.22. Over 2.5 sits near 38%, while BTTS is around 37%. These are model distribution reads, not guaranteed outcomes, and are best used to understand match tempo before kickoff.
| Iran xG | 1.59 |
|---|---|
| New Zealand xG | 0.63 |
| Predicted score | 2-1 |
| Over 2.5 goals | 38% |
| BTTS | 37% |
Trust
Data Status and Use Boundary
Sources: schedule.csv, game_predictions.csv, Official FIFA squad list: 48 teams / 1248 players.
Related Links
Continue with related matches, teams and groups
These links connect the match read with team pages, group pages, the compare tool and data sources.
Primary forecast
Iran vs New Zealand: primary prediction
The primary page for this fixture: start with who is more likely to win.
Search angle
Iran vs New Zealand: lineups
Focused on key players, likely XI, bench depth and pending source status.
FAQ
The model currently leans Iran win at 61%, with projected score 2-1 and final score 2-2.
The model score is 2-1, expected total goals are 2.22, Over 2.5 is around 38%, and BTTS is around 37%.
They are not official lottery odds. The page shows public market reference odds when the site cache matches; official Sporttery stays pending, and model fair odds are only probability comparisons.
The most likely score is 2-1, expected goals are 2.22, Over 2.5 is around 38%, and BTTS is around 37%; use it as tempo context, not a fixed result.
The review compares final score 2-2 with predicted score 2-1, model direction, score error, goal error and group impact.